The part that particularly responds to the rumors says:
Apple has by no means used Siri knowledge to create advertising and marketing profiles, has by no means made it accessible for promoting, and has by no means offered it to anybody for any objective. We’re always growing applied sciences to make Siri much more non-public, and we are going to proceed to take action.
After Tthe guardian report in 2019, Apple he apologized and adjusted his coveragesetting the default setting to not retain audio recordings of Siri interactions and saying that for customers who select to share recordings, these recordings is not going to be shared with third-party contractors.
Nonetheless, studies on the settlement famous that in earlier displays like this one from 2021A few of the plaintiffs claimed that after mentioning manufacturers equivalent to “Olive Backyard,” “Easton bats,” “Pit Viper Sun shades,” and “Air Jordans,” they have been proven adverts for the corresponding merchandise, which they attributed to Siri knowledge.
Apple’s assertion tonight says that it “doesn’t retain audio recordings of Siri interactions until customers explicitly decide in to assist enhance Siri, and even then, the recordings are used solely for that objective.” Customers can simply unsubscribe at any time.”
Fb responded to related theories in 2014 and 2016 earlier than Mark Zuckerberg addressed it instantlysaying “no” to the query whereas being grilled by Congress over the Cambridge Analytica scandal in 2018.
So if Apple (and Fb, Google, and so forth.) is telling the reality, why would you later see an advert for one thing you solely talked about?
There are different explanations, and makes an attempt to confirm the rumors embrace an investigation in 2018 which discovered no proof of microphone eavesdropping, however did uncover that some apps have been secretly recording person exercise on display screen and sending it to 3rd events.